
The marriage of Roamware and Macalla must be evaluated separately though. While I respect both companies and the people that are in charge (I know them all well), I am doubtful that this merger will work. The culture and approaches of the two companies are so different that it would without doubt lead to friction in my opinion. It would be interesting to understand the rationale and reasoning for making this marriage happen. Could it be that the merger was required because of some urgent matters that could not be postponed?
3 comments:
Don't you think the coming together of such varying culture will bring in creativity and 'new'ness to the products if handled properly?
I'm sure Roamware MFS folks see things your way and work on brining better values.
Hi Hannes
Some mergers / acquisitions / stakes do make sense and I think the whole culture difference argument can sometimes be a bit overblown. There are inevitable strategic, operational, technological, and human challenges that have to be dealt with in almost any merger. But I think this and other transactions in this space announced recently are a testament to good technology and the appreciation and growing acknowledgement that mobile financial services, with the right investment and backing, will almost radically change the way we do banking and payments.
Samee, I agree with you. This merger is a testament to an increased interest in this space and in the long run will be goo dfor the industry.
Post a Comment