Showing posts with label currency. Show all posts
Showing posts with label currency. Show all posts

Friday, May 30, 2008

In the absence of mobile banking


What do people do when they do not have access to Mobile banking and payment solutions. Surely if a major need exist they consumers must utilise alternatives. The fact of the matter is that they do, often with major risks and costs associated with the alternatives.

The most often used alternative is the use of Premium SMS's. This is still by far the most often used mechanism to pay for content in the mobile world. Few consumers realise this, but the cost of performing a transaction with premium SMS's are as high as 50%. This means that half the price of the goods (content in this case) is paid in order to perform the transaction. If this type of payment were utilised in the purchase of lets say groceries, goods would cost twice as much as they do now.

Another example is payments being charged to your phone bill for broadband usage for instance.

The use airtime as currency is gaining momentum especially where money must be sent over a distance. This means of payment is hugely expensive and also unsafe. This mechanisms does not provide for any consumer protection, yet is being used daily to solve problems that consumers in the lower income bracket are confronted with. In some instance, I have even seen airtime being used as hedging against currency fluctuations. This practice is not only technical illegal, but also inherently dangerous for participants in such schemes.

All of the above is indicative for the need for cost effective, secure, easy to use payment solutions available on mobile phones.

Monday, May 19, 2008

Top five posts

I track the visitors to my blog, thanks to Google Analytics. I can report that the blog is being visited, and (hopefully) read. With an average time of almost two minutes spent on the blog (yes, they can measure that), it does seem that some people find some of the entries interesting.

As part of the feedback that I get from Google Analytics, I get statistics on the blog-entries that are visited most. Although not a statistically big enough sample, I started keeping a record of my top five blogs. Those entries that have been visited the most during the past month. I thought that this may be an indication of what people are interested in. Well, here are the top five posts on my blog:
  • Why SIM solutions are best for mobile banking (read here)
  • Airtime as Currency (read here)
  • Mobile banking in Africa (read here)
  • Africa as mobile banking benchmark (read here)
  • Important elements of mobile banking (read here)
I don't know what it means, but I thought it is interesting. Maybe I should write some more about these topics...

Monday, May 05, 2008

Airtime as Currency

I should have blogged on this before, as this is a hot topic. Many examples of schema that utilise airtime as an alternative to real currency can be found. These solutions either provide for person to person payments and also for remittance solutions in a number of cases. The question now arises if this is not the way to go.

My take on this, is an emphatic NO! This is for one just not sustainable (see some of my comments below), but also potentially extremely hazardous to the underwriter of this currency (the mobile operator). If this approach really takes off and more and more currency needs to be produced to support the demand (money supply), serious problems like inflation, run-on-the-bank etc. could materialise. Mobile Operators are not in a position to deal with this. If they fully assess the potential implication on a devaluation of their airtime stock, I believe that they would put measures in place to stop it immediately (like elapse dates on pre-paid airtime). They should be apprehensive to ever start treating their airtime like money in the hands of consumers.

In addition, I think that using airtime for money in any format is totally unsustainable, because I believe that using airtime as money would be:
  • Very expensive
  • Totally inefficient as compared to proper e-money solutions
  • Does not provide security to the client
  • Would be illegal in any properly regulated environment
If airtime is being used as currency, it should be seen as an absolute indication of banks failing to
provide in an obvious need.