- The addressable market is 70 million out of a population of 90 million
- Monthly value of P5 billion (US$ 115 million) is processed on Globe and P13 billion (US$ 300 million) on Smart.
- More than 18 000 outlets (agents, merchants?)
- Smart now have 8.5 million subscribers
These numbers are impressive, but I wanted to get a feel for growth, usage, profitability and efficiency and felt that the metrics (and the numbers) just scratch the surface. What about looking at metrics like average transaction value, money retained per subscriber, volume transacted by subscriber by month or cost/revenue per subscriber or per transaction. Also what was it like one year ago and how ill it look in a years time? Things like this would have told me more about the service and how well it is doing (or will be doing).
As we get to know the industry better, should we not develop commonly acceptable metrics that we can share to evaluate how well we are doing?
1 comment:
The metrics you mention are key to understanding the growth, usage, profitability and efficiency of the users. Tracking these metrics on a monthly basis will allow you to identify trends that will then help you to focus on areas that need further drill down to identify the drivers of over or under performance.
Your internal metric definitions can be used as the standard metrics for the industry. However, the knowledge behind your monthly internal data is a competitive advantage that should not be shared. What I have seen re industry benchmarks are annual surveys which are compiled from annual data submitted by companies in the industry. These are especially useful to use as guides and/or benchmarks when you are analyzing your monthly metric trends, and I would encourage you to particapate in them (or start one that becomes the Industry Standard!).
JF
Post a Comment